Democrats in Washington state want annual Sheriff inspections of your home
jj20030
Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 5,448
a new bill has been submitted that requires the Sheriff to inspect your home if you are grandfathered in with an "assault rifle" which otherwise is banned in the future. The liberals continue to nibble around the edges until they have eaten the entire cake. While this bill probably won't pass, it accurately shows where the democrats are heading in liberal states.
linkCLICKHERE
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020373291_westneat17xml.html
linkCLICKHERE
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020373291_westneat17xml.html
Comments
Did you read their responses? " He did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on". An 8 page bill that he sponsored for heaven's sake. These liberals are all idiots, and liars.
"...said he did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on. “I made a mistake,” Kline said. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.”
No, you should not vet more, you should resign immediately since you took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
Elected representatives often say and do dumb things, just like everybody else. Elected Republicans and Democrats alike too often don't think things through before acting, or speaking. I am not a huge fan of either Harry Reed or Ms. Pelosi, but one thing I am certain of - this "liberal/conservative" divide too often encourages just as much stupid, thoughtless, and hateful remarks from the general public as we see from our elected representatives. Just like the old Stephen Stills lyric - "with so many screamin', & no one a-listening', how do we decide?"
As for this article, I am 100% with the reporter. The proposed legislation will be changed, but this was a really stupid way to begin to build trust so that reasonable regulation of military weapons in civilian society can go forward.
Today I place the blame for the divisions in this country squarely at the door of right wing talk radio and Fox, and on the Tea Party, and their reaction to the election of President Obama.
We could debate why the country is divided, but you and I are never going to see eye to eye on that topic, so we ought to just agree to disagree and try to keep it civil.
No representative shall be allowed to vote on the passage of legislation unless the bill was read in entirety aloud in the House and the member was present, awake, and able to discuss the various aspects of the legislation as outlined in the proposal. Any member not present, may not vote. A quorum must be present prior to voting. Any bill so read, and not meeting the above conditions will be discarded and must be resubmitted prior to further discussion.
I think it would fix a lot of problems, or at least prevent a lot of idiocy, on both sides of the aisle.
This bill is not going to pass and from what the morons said they didn't know about the part you are freaking out. Not sure it's a good thing they didn't know because they did sponsor it, but hardly a new thing in congress. A lot of people do not read everything, they have aides for it.