Attention: Cuban Fanatics

Steve2010

Which one: Cohiba 1966's LE's or Piramides Extra?

"Both" is not an option.

Thanks for your input!

james40

Don't know the difference sir but my vote is for a '66. Congrats.

robertgreen30

Smoke the 66

camgfs

Steve2010:

Which one: Cohiba 1966's LE's or Piramides Extra?

The Piramides Extra will probably smoke better with a couple of years on it. Same goes for the 66, but of the two I'd smoke the 66!

Steve2010

Going to CdLH in a few days and will be picking up a box of something to add to the BHKs.

rzaman

Steve, it depends what is your goal with a box. 1966 is a great cigar but need some age. I have predicated in my review that within 4-5 years this cigar will perform better than Cohiba Behike. You heard me right, I put 1966 ahead of Behike in terms of aging potential. When we smoke a cigar we can feel it. If you can wait 3-5 years then 1966.

If your goal is to smoke within a year or two then go for Cohiba Pyramid Extra. This is an excellent cigar. I might review it tonight. I am cooking Indian Lamb Byriani. I need a full bodied smoke after that.

However both need some aging now. That's my two cents.

Steve2010:

Which one: Cohiba 1966's LE's or Piramides Extra?

"Both" is not an option.

Thanks for your input!

rzaman

rzaman:

Steve, it depends what is your goal with a box. 1966 is a great cigar but need some age. I have predicated in my review that within 4-5 years this cigar will perform better than Cohiba Behike. You heard me right, I put 1966 ahead of Behike in terms of aging potential. When we smoke a cigar we can feel it. If you can wait 3-5 years then 1966.

If your goal is to smoke within a year or two then go for Cohiba Pyramid Extra. This is an excellent cigar. I might review it tonight. I am cooking Indian Lamb Byriani. I need a full bodied smoke after that.

However both need some aging now. That's my two cents.

Steve2010:

Which one: Cohiba 1966's LE's or Piramides Extra?

"Both" is not an option.

Thanks for your input!

rzaman

rzaman:

Steve, I just posted the review of Cohiba Pyramid Extra. I also reviewed the 1966 in the the past. They should give you some idea what to expect.

rzaman:

Steve, it depends what is your goal with a box. 1966 is a great cigar but need some age. I have predicated in my review that within 4-5 years this cigar will perform better than Cohiba Behike. You heard me right, I put 1966 ahead of Behike in terms of aging potential. When we smoke a cigar we can feel it. If you can wait 3-5 years then 1966.

If your goal is to smoke within a year or two then go for Cohiba Pyramid Extra. This is an excellent cigar. I might review it tonight. I am cooking Indian Lamb Byriani. I need a full bodied smoke after that.

However both need some aging now. That's my two cents.

Steve2010:

Which one: Cohiba 1966's LE's or Piramides Extra?

"Both" is not an option.

Thanks for your input!

Steve2010

Thanks! I read the 1966 earlier, and just read the Pyramid review. Looks like it's going to be the Pyramids. Thanks for the assist!

Diamondog

I would not suggest the CPE, the '66 is ready to smoke the CPE is not even close

Steve2010

Well hell, they're out of both now. I was going to "settle" for some Maduro 5's, but I guess I'll wait. Thanks for all the help though!