Camacho
Bad Andy
Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 848
Ok so I've had the '62 but can anyone tell their opinions on any of the cigars in the line?
Comments
I've had the '62 as well. I didn't buy the hype about the pre-embargo blend, but I'll be damned if it wasn't pretty fantastic.
Camacho Havana is medium-full bodied, a moderate spice and a good, old time flavor. One that I like.
I think that covers the Camacho cigars I've had, one of these days I'm going to settle down with the Diploma I've had for some time now.
If you'd like to sample a couple of the Triple Maduros Andy, let me know and I can send a couple your way.
THe only other Camacho I've had is the 1962 and the Corojo, I believe, the greenish label says Jamastran on the side. I like that cigar, nice spicy kick to her.
I tried the 62 one day and wasn't too impressed, but it was young. I have a couple more, including a couple Pre-Embargos that I'm sitting on to try again.
I had the Camacho Liberty 2006 and was a bit let down by it but it wasnt too bad. not really worth the price IMO.
The SLR maduro is freakin fantastic
Im a big fan of the Havana line. I find it spicy and a delicate sweet. yum. one of my favorite camachos
the Corojo is good but not nearly as round as the SLR maduro... not as creamy chocolate either.
the Diploma.... old school diplomas would put you on you ass. but thats not what made it good. It was similar to the Corojo but rounder and stronger. It was what the corojo line tries to be.
havent tried the triple maduro yet.... sorry bout that.
The Coyolar is the one that peaked my interest as a puro. But with yours and Maddy's further descriptions I wouldn't mind trying one or two.
I will kindly take you up on that offer Jozer.
Oh and pm sent also.