Home Ratings & Reviews

Cain F Lancero (A MUST READ)

BlueRingsBlueRings Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 367

Comments

  • BlueRingsBlueRings Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 367
    Everyone inquire with Cigar.com to have Studio tobac to put this in production. I am so excited about this cigar I want ever serious cigar aficionado to experiance it. I can only hope Olivia would want the same.
  • ndhaon91ndhaon91 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 441
  • fla-gypsyfla-gypsy Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 3,023
    Wow, that is quite an endorsment
  • PuroFreakPuroFreak Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 4,132
    Thanks for the info! Now you've made me even more determined to get that sampler! Damn I want that cigar now!
  • kuzi16kuzi16 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 14,471
  • Rob1110Rob1110 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 1,454
    Awesome review, man. Makes me wish I never read it because unless they go into production, chances of me trying one are probably pretty slim.
  • lilwing88lilwing88 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 2,787
    What are the dimensions on this? I tried a Cain Daytona Petite Corona that was pretty awesome. I think that they're similar ring gauges.
  • BlueRingsBlueRings Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 367
    7x38 size, I pounded out this review in a hurry. I have a box of the #4 Daytona which appears to have some similar profiles although it is missing the Condega, and Esteli region tobacco. Why I believe the cigar is superior to a Cain F is the difference is the length and size. The length of the cigar tempers the flavors much more, and proportionally there is more wrapper and less filler. The length helps filter any harshness and allows for a cooler smoke with equates to more flavor. That is why different shapes and sizes create different experiances. Also why the same cigar line has a cigar that rates 93 and the same cigar with the same tobacco used scored an 88.
  • kuzi16kuzi16 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 14,471
  • BlueRingsBlueRings Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 367
    Thank you for the information; it was an observation on how length tempered the temperature of this cigar. I have been lead to believe you would want the hottest burn so all of the oils become smoke in the cigar or you would smolder which creates an acrid/sooty taste. In some of the cigars I have smoked with 52 or larger ring gauge it would result in a cooler burn which gave me an indication of a cooler smoke. Although I have found some of the larger ring gauges require more draw and effort. They also tend to go out more often. Fact is too much heat kills flavor which is only materializes in your mouth. A hot smoke it an awful experience. I believe if you temper the heat with an appropriately rolled, longer cigar, which should assist in cooling the smoke from the burn at the foot, it makes for a better cigar. That is just my observation if all other things were equal. I just wanted to reflect that in my review. I believed it had a positive impact on the cigar that I have experienced. That length tempered the heat well and allowed me to taste more of the cigar, and that is the reason I believed it was a better smoke for it.
  • kuzi16kuzi16 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 14,471
    BlueRings:
    Thank you for the information; it was an observation on how length tempered the temperature of this cigar. I have been lead to believe you would want the hottest burn so all of the oils become smoke in the cigar or you would smolder which creates an acrid/sooty taste. In some of the cigars I have smoked with 52 or larger ring gauge it would result in a cooler burn which gave me an indication of a cooler smoke. Although I have found some of the larger ring gauges require more draw and effort. They also tend to go out more often. Fact is too much heat kills flavor which is only materializes in your mouth. A hot smoke it an awful experience. I believe if you temper the heat with an appropriately rolled, longer cigar, which should assist in cooling the smoke from the burn at the foot, it makes for a better cigar. That is just my observation if all other things were equal. I just wanted to reflect that in my review. I believed it had a positive impact on the cigar that I have experienced. That length tempered the heat well and allowed me to taste more of the cigar, and that is the reason I believed it was a better smoke for it.
    well said. and as far as experience goes the length DID temput the heat just not in the same way i was talking about... so in a way we are both right.
  • BlueRingsBlueRings Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 367
  • j0z3rj0z3r Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 9,403
    I can imagine a lancero being tough to roll due to the narrow ring over the length, it has to be difficult to keep a uniform bunch the whole way down without having tight spots or loose spots...my hat is off to the people who roll these for a living, that's a skill I sure don't have and likely couldn't learn.
  • kuzi16kuzi16 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 14,471
Sign In or Register to comment.