Home› General Discussion

C.COM Newsletter

laker1963laker1963 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 5,046
in General Discussion
Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • SmokySuitSmokySuit Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 429
    Yea, I got the email too but it appears the Jan 2 newsletter isn’t up yet. I've been checking it all morning. I want to read the Greycliff reveiw. I love that cigar!! Hope it's posted soon.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YankeeManYankeeMan Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 1,377
    I thought it was just me. I tried several times to read some of the articles, but it kept going back to the 12/19 issue. My kids tell me I'm an analog guy in a digital world.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaschNutsRaschNuts Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 882
    laker1963:
    Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
    I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weeks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • undulacundulac Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 1,129
    This happened with the last newsletter, at least it did for me. It took a while for it to update on the site. It was a weekend last time too. I wonder if that has something to do about it?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • laker1963laker1963 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 5,046
    RaschNuts:
    laker1963:
    Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
    I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weeks
    NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bacon.jaybacon.jay Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 718
    laker1963:
    RaschNuts:
    laker1963:
    Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
    I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weeks
    NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.
    No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Alex SvensonAlex Svenson BlogAdministrator, Everyone, ForumsAdministrator, Moderator, Owners, Registered Users Posts: 1,204
    Hanks for the heads up. We changed some formatting and will get this resolved.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • laker1963laker1963 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 5,046
    bacon.jay:
    laker1963:
    RaschNuts:
    laker1963:
    Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
    I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weeks
    NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.
    No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.

    DOH !!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • cabinetmakercabinetmaker Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 2,561
    laker1963:
    bacon.jay:
    laker1963:
    RaschNuts:
    laker1963:
    Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
    I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weeks
    NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.
    No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.

    DOH !!!
    *shaking head*

    Must be a Canadian thing :p
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • laker1963laker1963 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 5,046
    cabinetmaker:
    laker1963:
    bacon.jay:
    laker1963:
    RaschNuts:
    laker1963:
    Just thought I would mention that the online C.COM newsletter for January that was just sent out, needs to be corrected. When you try to use a link within the newsletter it sends you to the Dec. 19, 2010 Newsletter not the January 02, 2010 newsletter.
    I'm sure you meant 2011 not 2010 lol. I'm sure we will all be doing that the next couple weeks
    NO, I meant it that way. The link is wrong and it takes you to last months newsletter. December of last year 2010. It should take you to January 2011 but it doesn't. That's right isn;t it? Now I'm confused LOL.
    No he meant for the year after January from your original post. You said January 2, 2010.

    DOH !!!
    *shaking head*

    Must be a Canadian thing :p
    Shaking head...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • amz1301amz1301 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 1,287
    Anyone else read the Cigar.com Newsletter - December 18, 2011 yet. Cigar.com Black Tie Fundraiser at the Sands Casino and Resort in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Fall 2012. Looks like this is going to be a first class event for really good cause.

    May have to start laying the ground work with the wife on this one now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 90+ Irishman90+ Irishman Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 7,868
    amz1301:
    Anyone else read the Cigar.com Newsletter - December 18, 2011 yet. Cigar.com Black Tie Fundraiser at the Sands Casino and Resort in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Fall 2012. Looks like this is going to be a first class event for really good cause.

    May have to start laying the ground work with the wife on this one now.
    Can't say I've read it yet, but thanks for the heads up, I'll find it now :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rwheelwrightrwheelwright Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 3,294
    I need to find out about the dinner. I would love to go if it is in the budget.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • The KidThe Kid Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 7,842
    Pretty good article on box press cigars..
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mmccartneydcmmccartneydc Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 3,358
    The Kid:
    Pretty good article on box press cigars..
    +1 I thought it was too, I don't know why, but I truly enjoy box pressed sticks the most. Not sure why, just do!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.