Rocky Patel
Husker44
Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 172
I'm a new poster and relatively new cigar smoker. I have lurked for a while and learned quite a bit.
Last night, I had my first Rocky Patel. It was a 1999 Vintage Connecticut. I really enjoyed the mild and smooth aspects of the cigar. What is the difference in this than the standard Connecticut? I assume aging. But what does aging do to the cigar? Make it milder, stronger, smoother?
Last night, I had my first Rocky Patel. It was a 1999 Vintage Connecticut. I really enjoyed the mild and smooth aspects of the cigar. What is the difference in this than the standard Connecticut? I assume aging. But what does aging do to the cigar? Make it milder, stronger, smoother?
Comments
the 1999 has not only a different wrapper (different year that is) but a different filler as well. the 1999 has a filler from nicaragua and the dominican where as the connecticut has filler from honduras.
i would expect the connecticut to be a bit more nutty and round where as the 1999 to be a bit more earth and maybe a bit more spice.
but take that with a grain of salt. i have yet to smoke either. i recommend you go out and try both within a two day span to see for yourself.
I have had both and surprisingly like the regulat Rocky Ct. better than the 1999.
I wanted to like the 99 better, it looked better, had more attractive bands and had the pedigree w the aged wrapper.
Turns out I lreally like the Rocky CT better. Ive only had the Robusto and the Toro and liked them both.
Both the 99 and the CT are good cigars, if the price points were switched around I would still like the CT better.
I think.
I'm a fan of the Vintage 1990 which I highly recommend: very mild and smooth.