j0z3r:Gene: I think I sent you a Tat Havana VI hermosos, that's the one if it had a red label. If it had a brown label, then it would be a Tat Miami regios. Both very good cigars in my opinion, though I prefer the Miami myself. Tonight was a Perdomo En Vidrio double corona that I received in trade from Rob1110. Now that was a darn tasty cigar, not quite like anything I've ever had. It is a pretty imposing cigar, measuring in around 7.5 x 54, but it smoked very smooth and had a smooth character backed by a medium-full strength. Yet another cigar to cement my opinion of Perdomo, they make some damn fine cigars.
kaspera79:Looks like Kim/joe just got deleted by the administrators.. I guess he didn't pass the random drug test.
Stoogee:camacho SLR and I have to say this is the best camacho I have had to date. Definately a stronger cigar but I like that and it had a smooth and while not overly complex flavor was good to the nub burned well and had a good spicy flavor.
rwheelwright:Seems like everyone is having a Gurkha night.
phobicsquirrel:I haven't nor do I have that cigar. I'm glad you weren't too fond of it. I think I'll skip this one. Have you had the Turk, a very good mild smoke but very creamy.. and vanillaly...
kuzi16:had the 90 yet? i think its better than the 92.