j0z3r: And I also doubt you'd want a 46 year old cigar anyhow, Cuban or not, it would probably be flavorless.
kuzi16: j0z3r: And I also doubt you'd want a 46 year old cigar anyhow, Cuban or not, it would probably be flavorless. Iduno about that. though all of us at the forum agree that CA's reviews are a bit tainted, they cant be 100% off. I remember an issue where they rated some cigars that were in the 40-50 year range. two of them were ratings of 100. Im not sure that it was worth the 100 rating but giving them that score at least hints that it isnt flavorless.
la-henry:Has anybody had these at all?? I was thinking about buying the 5 pack that cigar.com has for when my friend comes back to the states for a month off of duty in the marines. Just wondering if it was a quality smoke.
j0z3r: kuzi16: j0z3r: And I also doubt you'd want a 46 year old cigar anyhow, Cuban or not, it would probably be flavorless. Iduno about that. though all of us at the forum agree that CA's reviews are a bit tainted, they cant be 100% off. I remember an issue where they rated some cigars that were in the 40-50 year range. two of them were ratings of 100. Im not sure that it was worth the 100 rating but giving them that score at least hints that it isnt flavorless.I wouldn't doubt it kuzi, but I would imagine cigars that hold up to 40-50 year aging and still maintain a decent amount of flavor are the extreme minority. Of course, you can fill a thimble with what I know about aged cigars, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt.
madurofan:Rob, This is cigar.com's forum it is generally considered poor taste to talk about or especially post other companies info or products. I know it wasn't ur intention to try to promote another site, just letting you know.
madurofan:Understandable just giving you the heads up. ... welcome by the way
I kicked out and bought a box of 'em about a year ago.. smoked two since then.
Excellent addition to the humidor and are very nice smokes